When lawyers research a complex legal question, identifying the relevant legislation is often only the beginning. They must also examine case law, understand how legal principles have been interpreted and consider which arguments and approaches may be available.
A lawyer working with Swiss law recently shared how she uses Jurilo for precisely this kind of research.
Because the underlying legal matters are confidential, the lawyer asked to remain anonymous. Her identity is known to Jurilo, and her answers have been edited for clarity and published with her consent.
Starting with the legal question—not a search term
The lawyer uses Jurilo on an ad hoc basis when she wants to research a specific legal question or explore a legal issue in greater depth.
Instead of beginning with a database, statutory provision or carefully constructed search term, she can formulate the question naturally:
“I can formulate the legal question in the way I would naturally think about it and then use Jurilo to explore the issue from there.”
Jurilo helps her identify the relevant Swiss legal framework, legislation and case law. But its usefulness does not stop at finding sources.
From legal research to arguments and strategy
In one complex matter, understanding the applicable legal framework was only the starting point. The lawyer also needed to consider different arguments, possible interpretations and the legal approaches that could be taken.
She began with a relatively broad question and then used Jurilo to explore the issue step by step.
“I don’t use Jurilo simply to find information. I can also ask it to help me think through the legal issue and assess possible strategies.”
For her, the biggest benefit is therefore a combination of speed, structuring and support for strategic legal thinking.
Why a Swiss-law-specific system matters
Without Jurilo, she would typically use a general-purpose AI tool as a starting point and supplement it with traditional legal research.
The difference is Jurilo’s specific focus on Swiss law and authoritative Swiss legal sources.
Instead of having to guide a general AI system repeatedly toward the correct jurisdiction and legal framework, she can ask the legal question directly and continue working from the answer.
This makes the research more focused, concrete and relevant—particularly when examining an issue in depth.
An interactive legal discussion
One of the aspects that surprised her most was the ability to continue the analysis interactively.
If an answer raises another question, she can ask Jurilo to examine that point further, challenge an approach or explore an alternative argument.
“That makes the tool feel much closer to having a structured legal discussion than simply carrying out a traditional search.”
She has found Jurilo’s answers and sources useful and reliable for the legal questions she has researched. As with every professional legal tool, the lawyer remains responsible for assessing the results and applying her own legal judgment.
More than a traditional legal search tool
Her conclusion for other lawyers considering Jurilo is straightforward:
“Its real value, in my experience, is the combination of legal research, analysis and strategy.”
A lawyer can start with a legal question, identify the relevant Swiss legal framework and sources, explore different arguments and approaches, and then continue the conversation to examine possible strategies.
That is where Jurilo moves beyond conventional legal search—and becomes an interactive tool for structured legal thinking.
Would you like to explore a complex Swiss legal question with Jurilo?